Sizing Gas/Liquid Separators When the Rate of Entrained Liquid is the Driving Factor
This article provides an overview of the 28 centrifugal gas/liquid separator models as relates to our online separator sizing calculators.
The first section is the design criteria to input, notably input the molecular weight of the gas, maximum temperature, minimum pressure at which to maintain separation efficiency and maximum flow rate for the application. If a reciprocating style compressor is delivering the flow, double the flow rate to ensure proper sizing.
The minimum separator size required is calculated for two types: standard and receiver style separators. Note “size” is an indirect reference to the minimum vessel diameter and cylindrical length of the separator body. Separator sizes are based upon the maximum allowable inlet nozzle ID and provides an easier way to compare different separator designs. Input the “chosen separator size” ≥ the calculated separator size required to review its performance.
The performance data for the chosen separator size based upon the design criteria (1). The data includes maximum vapor capacity (volumetric and mass), the percentage capacity used based upon size chosen and the differential pressure for both maximum capacity and the design criteria. If your application has maximum differential pressure threshold, you may need to increase the separator size until you satisfy that design criteria.
Table of maximum liquid separation capacity in mass and volumetric units based upon the six possible separation capacities (capacity is separator model dependent). These capacities help you compare between designs, for example using a design which has a 60% separation capacity compared to a larger size based upon a 20% or 40% design.
The maximum capacity for a given size gas/liquid separator is dependent upon the operating pressure; at higher pressures the capacity increases. The maximum liquid separation capacity is expressed as a percentage of the maximum vapor flow rate capacity for a given set of design criteria, but mostly the lowest operating pressure at which maximum separation efficiency is required. In the example the 5% – 90% table data are with reference to a maximum vapor capacity of 73,285 lbs/hr.
Separation efficiency for single stage gas/liquid separators is separation of entrained droplets > 10 microns in diameter with 99% efficiency. Dual stage (coalescing) separators may separate droplets as fine as >0.3 microns in diameter with 99% efficiency.
Some separator models are designed for specific application characteristics which range from separation of liquid “slugs” to separation of viscous, slurry or high particulate vapor flows.
CLICK THE PICTURE TO VIEW CORRESPONDING DATASHEET
The maximum liquid separation capacity for these designs is equivalent to 5% of the maximum rated capacity.
These separator designs have a separation capacity equivalent to 10%.
31L/S, 33L, 35L, 36L, DTL, 35L/36L
There are several separator designs which have a separation capacity equivalent to 20%, including coalescing and clog resistant versions.
These separator designs have a separation capacity equivalent to 40% of the maximum capacity of a given size separator.
The type TS separator has a separation capacity equivalent to 60% of the maximum capacity of a given size separator. The type TS is based upon a type T design (40%) except it has an elongated body to increase separation capacity and has a hold-up volume to support drainage via specialized valves or pump systems.
This design is referred to as a “receiver separator” and has a separation capacity equivalent to 90% of the maximum capacity of a given size separator. As reflected in the sizing calculator a larger separator body size is typically required for such a high liquid separation rate. Continuing with our example, an 8” size separator is sufficient for the design criteria but a 10” size is required if using a receiver separator design. This is due to increased internal complexity required to achieve high liquid separation rates.
When the liquid entrainment rate is the driving factor for separator sizing, often receiver separators will provide separation in the smallest physical “footprint” when compared to “oversizing” other separator designs.